Constitutional Patriotism

Truly divisive – Govt infiltration of militia, coalition and Oathkeepers joint venture at Bundy Ranch

The Bundy Affair – Oath Keepers vs. Militia – Part II

The Bundy Affair – Oath Keepers vs. Militia – Part II

Gary Hunt
Outpost of Freedom
April 29, 2014

In these past few weeks, we have seen history unfolding right before our very eyes. Events in Bunkerville, Nevada, have been watched on the evening news throughout the country, and quite possibly, around the world. For the first time in a century and a half, Americans stood, defiant, ready to go to the wall, against the government, or at least one of her administrative agencies, to assure that the erosion of our liberties ceases, and we begin to restore our rights to what our forefathers intended.

From a people rather complacent for most of their lives comes a new test not unlike that which the Founders faced back in 1774 — the determination of who is on our side and who is not; who is committed and who is not; who is willing to give his life for a cause that he believes in and who is not, and that what this story is about.

Recent events in Bunkerville portray that test in vivid and sensational detail. I give a chronology to these events, and they will be presented in Pacific Daylight Time, regardless of the local time where some of them occurred. This is to insure continuity, and that the sequence is properly portrayed.

At about 2:30 pm, Friday April 25, 2014, Mr. X received a call from an associate. This call would provide for some interesting disclosure over the next 6 hours. The associate is described as a fellow participant in Open Source Intelligence, a nuclear physicist, a Democrat, a higher-ranking military officer, and that held a “Yankee White” security clearance.

I spent nearly an hour going over the details with Mr. X, to whom I have promised confidentiality. I am fully satisfied as to the veracity of what he told me. Though I did ask him if it would be possible to talk with the associate, with a guarantee of anonymity, he assured me that this would not be possible, as was made clear by the associate. I then asked him if Oath Keepers had asked if they could interview his source. His answer was, no they did not. This, to me, is a rather curious omission, even though the answer would be anticipated to be as it was — so much for the intelligence gathering ability of Oath Keepers, but, hey, I’m just a reporter. What would I know?

The story related in the conversation between Mr. X and the associate is that the associate had received information from a source he knew in the Defense Department (DOD). The source at DOD said that they had received orders from Eric Holder, of the Justice Department, to conduct drone surveillance of the Bundy property and to conduct a hot drone strike on the ranch and those on or around it. This was to occur within between 24 to 48 hours, and that there were to be no witnesses nor would any videos be allowed to leave the area.

Mr. X was quite shaken by what he had heard and expressed those concerns back at the associate. Wouldn’t this be going too far in the eyes of the public? Answer: They are prepared to deal with that. There is no way that this could be covered up. Response: They are prepared for that. It was suggested that this would lead to martial law based upon authority provided for in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). He was also told that the justification for the strike was based upon Harry Reid’s assertion that Bundy and those supporting him were “Domestic Terrorists”. To each of Mr. X’s queries, similar answers were provided to justify the story being conveyed.

Mr. X was, to say the least, perplexed and did not know what to do with this information. By about 3:00 pm, he contacted Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers. Rhodes, upon receipt of this information wisely dispatched Wes (aka “Mac”, Oath Keepers Intelligence Officer, about 6′ tall, older gentleman, prior Special Forces operator, driving a silver pickup truck) and Michelle to meet with Mr. X. and ‘vett’ him to determine whether he was sincere and to make an evaluation of the story.

Jumping ahead to 8:03 pm, John Jacob Schmidt, Radio Free Redoubt, interviewed Rhodes and other Oath Keepers (21’18″) regarding this story. Rhodes, justifiably, pointed out that the vetting had convinced him that the source (Mr. X) was sincere, though there was no way of verifying Mr. X’s source. Rhodes said that there was a risk to his credibility by putting this out, but since there was a concern for human lives, the story must be gotten out. Rhodes also pointed out, in releasing the story, that he was not going to “let my people die on my watch” and to “err on the side of caution for my guys.” Of course, the advertisement at the end of the radio interview was an enlistment ad for Oath Keepers.

Let me return to my interview with Mr. X. We discussed potential scenarios that might occur, considering the strike and its ramifications. Presuming the government had drone surveillance, and wanted to assure maximum effect, they would have a containment team to prevent any attempt of any of people to leave the area, as they did in Waco, where only those who came out in view of the cameras came out alive. They would have to insure meeting the objective of the strike — all personnel dead and evidence destroyed. As Rhodes pointed out, they would need a follow on team, though he didn’t address containment. That follow on team could surely serve as the containment team prior, and the follow on team subsequent, to the strike. We also discussed the ramifications — the effect on the American, and world, public, should such a strike occur. We all know how even the Mainstream Media (MSM) reacted to the directed drone strikes that killed two American citizens in Yemen, even though they had sided with our ‘enemy’. What would be the consequence of a general, indiscriminate, attack on men, women, and children, on American Soil, for merely resisting the enforcement of an agency rule to “rustle” Bundy’s cattle? No shots fired, no deaths, or even injuries. Would the public stand for it, and would Congressmen, even Democrats, scramble to condemn the action? Would a hundred million Americans realize that the government had gone berserk? Would they then flock to the cause of those who would resist such tyranny? Even MSM might even turn, drastically, against the administration. Would Jay Carney have trouble attempting to justify such action?

The probability of such an action is, at least, remote, and such intelligence should be used only within the confines of the current operations at the Bundy Ranch, rather than risk ridicule, when precautions could easily be taken, without public notice of such a threat?

Returning to the time line of events, we now go back to the Ranch to see what activity occurred because of this threat. At between 5:00 and 6:00 pm, Oath Keepers at the ranch began packing up their gear. At about 8:00 pm, about the time of the radio interview, Rhodes used the internal communication system and notified the Oath Keepers that they should move out. By 8:30 pm, 30-40 Oath Keepers in the encampment had moved out, as had the Oath Keepers command circle. Only about 5 Oath Keepers remained at the ranch to protect the Bundy family and property. Where did the others go? To the Virgin River Motel, possibly at the expense of the contributions sent to Oath Keepers, contributions having been made to provide protection for the Bundys, not for luxurious comforts for those who had abandoned their posts.

Later that evening (exact time unknown) a conference call was made between State Representative Michelle Fiore, Stewart Rhodes, Pete Santilli (patriot videographer), Booda Bear (Personal Security Detail for the Bundy family), Ryan Payne, Militia Liaison, and LTC Potter (who states, “I am a former US Army LTC of 28 years. I served in various Military Police and Military Intelligence positions around the globe. I was also a municipal police officer for about 3 years. I bring my unique experience, training, education, and spiritual insights to bear in analyzing important issues and trends in the U.S. and the world.”). The result of the conversation was to request that Representative Fiore contact the Governor and request the State’s support, independent of the militia, to provide protection for those Americans on the ground at the ranch. To date, there has been no response from the Governor.

So, let’s put a bit of perspective on what can be deduced by the actions of some of the players in these events.

First, as explained in my article, Vortex, if the government wants to disrupt or bring ridicule on the patriot community, it would choose an innocent patriot who they hoped would be likely to spread the story, indiscriminately, throughout the patriot community. However, the chosen conduit, the Vortex, had enough sense to provide the information, discretely, to someone he respected, hence the message going to Oath Keepers. Oath Keepers could have contained the story and still benefitted, in every way, by preparing for that eventuality. Instead, they chose to go public with it, for reasons unknown.

The Oath Keeper mission, “to not obey unconstitutional orders”, had, by their participation at the ranch, extended to “protecting the Bundy family”. They also declare that their purpose includes “education”. Now, if their mission is to protect the Bundy Family, just how far does that go? Given the choice of fulfilling their mission, by removing the Bundys, by force, if necessary, or holding their ground against the ‘enemy”, they chose to abandon that mission, for their own protection. Being that their membership is largely Law Enforcement, it appears that they have also adopted the “Officer Safety” principle adhered to by Law Enforcement to justify killing unarmed civilians. In this instance, the outcome would have been the same, had the strike occurred. In military parlance, this would be tantamount to desertion under fire. I can only suggest that the purpose for going public with the story was to justify their withdrawal, after the beating that they have recently taken as a result of an article, The Bundy Affair – Oathkeepers vs. Militia, wherein one of their officers, in the comments section, is unable to address some of the concerns raised.

Various discussions around the Internet have also brought their true role and purpose at the Bundy Ranch into question. I won’t suggest that this event, the drone strike, may have been a setup by the Oath Keepers to bow out gracefully, as I don’t believe that they would stoop that low. However, I can only wonder why those stalwart militiamen held their ground, while the professed bearers of the torch chose to flee. Not quite like the roles played in the American Revolutionary War, where militia fled and the trained soldiers held their ground — to the last extremity.

Now, some have suggested that this controversy between militia and Oath Keepers has caused division in the patriot community. I am inclined to see this in a different light, in that, in these times, we must separate the voices from the action; Those who will stand, and those who will not; those who are true patriots, and those who only mouth those words.

Epilogue: Yesterday, the militia command structure, which is a shared command rather than top down, held a Coalition meeting to provide insight into why Oath Keepers, with the exception of those few who stood their ground like real patriots, were deemed persona non grata, by those who still stand their ground, and truly honor their oaths. Coalition Meeting of April 28 – caution, language.

Finally, a Salute to all true Americans that seek a return to the government intended by the Constitution.

The Bundy Affair – Oathkeepers vs. Militia part 1

The Bundy Affair – Oathkeepers vs. Militia

Gary Hunt
Outpost of Freedom
April 24, 2014

Oathkeepers is a national organization founded by Elmer Stewart Rhodes in 2009. By 2011, they had a reported membership of 12,000, though no current membership figures are readily available. Their stated Purpose:

Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” That oath, mandated by Article VI of the Constitution itself, is to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and Oath Keepers declare that they will not obey unconstitutional orders, such as orders to disarm the American people, to conduct warrantless searches, or to detain Americans as “enemy combatants” in violation of their ancient right to jury trial. See the Oath Keepers Declaration of Orders We Will Not Obey for details.

Interestingly, they say that they will not “conduct warrantless searches”, though those in law enforcement do so every day. But, then, that is not the point of discussing Oathkeepers, so, on with the story.

They declare that “THEY will not obey unconstitutional orders”. Otherwise, they did not explicitly state, since they refer to their “oaths”, that they will “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic”, though that is not their primary purpose, only incidental. Nowhere do they make that their purpose. Only not to obey unconstitutional orders. This needs to be emphasized as this is where the rubber meets the road.

Though we have no current numbers, the membership structure consists of both Full and Associate memberships, with Full being $40 per year and Associate being $7.00. Associates are supporters that don’t meet the criteria defined in the “Purpose”.

We must ask ourselves why Oathkeepers are even on the scene. They have taken an oath not to violate their oath. That is well and good, but let’s look at how that fits into the current situation. Oathkeepers (not associate Oathkeepers) are current, ex, or retired law enforcement, etc., and military. So, we’ll look, first, at Law Enforcement.

Active Law Enforcement are currently paid by the enemy (government), just as the Redcoats were 230 years ago. If they were on our side and acted in conjunction with Constitutional Militia, they would, in essence, be fighting themselves or their brother LEOs). They may still be on the side of their brothers. However, if you look at almost any state, Law Enforcement Officers are specifically excluded from the militia — check your own state statute under the militia section. So, on to ex-LEOs. This would presume that they did not get the time in for retirement, leaving the question as to, “Why?” Sort of reminds us of the guy charged with a crime and then the charges are, mysteriously, dropped; or, the guy that has an assignment that requires that he shed his Law Enforcement identity. Finally, we come to the Retired LEO. He is receiving a very substantial paycheck. Many larger cities have salaries for these full-term officers in excess of 100 thousand dollars per year. That would prove to be a tidy sum, which, surely, the retiree would not be willing to relinquish because he participated in an event that was an action against his brothers in Law Enforcement. We must judge based upon what we can use as a benchmark to measure the probability of actual concurrence with the efforts of the militia.

With regard to LEOs, since 1967, law enforcement training has focused on a “them or us” mentality. That means that though they are sworn to enforce the law, that policy is inapplicable if the offender is a brother law enforcer, except, perhaps, in extremely egregious circumstances, likely comprising a very small fraction of a percent of all LEO offenses. Will he ever be willing to disassociate himself from an aura of superiority that had become a mainstay of his life?

On the other hand, their disdain for the public safety, as demonstrated so often by “policy” of “Officer Safety” resulting in hundreds of killings per year of innocent, unarmed citizens. If an officer is involved in such incident, he gets administrative leave, with pay, pending investigation — yes, paid vacation, not taken from his contractual vacation time — for killing someone. If by some chance the victim’s family prevails in a lawsuit, then the taxpayers pay the damages and costs. What a deal! But, I digress, though that digression is also important to the story.

In addition, perhaps we should consider the proliferation of Fusion Centers, where various federal agencies interface with local law enforcement officers. Can we reasonably expect that there is not a degree of encouragement for the locals to infiltrate, or at least, ingratiate, the various patriot groups to obtain intelligence on their operations? If so, the simple next step is to attempt to gain influence to be able to direct, or at least influence, those groups’ activities, in support of their federal comrades.

Now, let’s look at the Military side of Oathkeepers. Active military can be of no assistance, as he would not go AWOL, or risk his leave, to do something that might get him an early discharge, at less than honorable. We’ll jump to Retired, and we will recognize the same problematic relationship with the pension of one who takes on the federal government. As well as his obedience to the government controlled environment for at least twenty years of his life. Though perhaps extreme, remember, Timothy McVeigh, recipient of a number of medals and an honorable discharge, was denied the burial rights that were guaranteed as a condition of enlistment. Surely, they can yank pensions on almost any grounds that they reasonably justify.

This leaves us with those who chose not to career, and since 1973 there has been no conscription (draft), so we needn’t address those who didn’t volunteer and deal only with those who volunteered to serve their country, did their duty, served their time, and got out to reenter civilian life. They have nothing to lose by participation with the militia, and they are not excluded by statute. Therefore, they are the only possible contingent of the Oathkeeper element that can relatively safely be assumed pure in their motivation.

With that one exception, they all have a conditioning in their lives that would suggest that they would tend to be inclined to a sort of special duty — infiltration of the militia — than they would to have of the pure motives of participation in the militia.

The Oathkeepers, by their oaths, only intend to “not violate their oath”. There is not provision in their corporate bylaws that provides for them stopping another person from violating his oath. The militia, on the other hand, having both helped in wresting control from England, and current situations, have been a mainstay, and by tradition as well as intent, are bound to support and defend the Constitution and their State’s constitution.

That being said, if Oathkeepers choose to participate in the events at Bunkerville, they should do so not as an Oathkeepers, but only as a member of a militia, which the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of each and every state, recognizes as a lawful and protected right — a right of united self-defense. They should be relegated to duties without access to privileged information or command. And, as such, are subordinate to the command within the militia structure, not to the patriarch of the Oathkeepers. Oathkeepers may, by choice, be militia. However, militia members, who have taken the same oath, absent the requisite requirement to join and pay the dues, may not be Oathkeepers. So, which of the two MUST be the subordinate?

Constitutional Patriotism

Muslims Attack Jewish Tourist in Berlin on Eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day


Muslims have their own way of remembering the Holocaust that they took part in. And the Nazis are back in Berlin. Except their cry is Allah Akbar instead of Heil Hitler.

A group of six Arabs attacked an Israeli man in Berlin, according to a report by Benjamin Weinthal in The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.

The 31-year-old Israeli filed a criminal complaint, according to the daily BZ newspaper. The paper titled its article ”Anti-Semitism: Punched in the face because he is Israeli.”

The six Arabs first confirmed the man was an Israel, and then identified themselves as “Palestinians”.

The BZ reported that the Israeli left his apartment with his wife and was confronted by a group of six young men. The youths surrounded the man and his wife, and struck his face. His wife was not injured. According to the report, the youths insulted him.

An ambulance took the Israeli to a hospital for care for his facial injuries. The police are investigating the attack.

Meanwhile in his address, Prime Minister Netanyahu warned about the dangers of ignoring reality.

When you refuse to accept reality as it is, you can deny it. And this is precisely what the leaders of the West did. They dismissed the murderous Nazi rhetoric as internal German politics; they downplayed the seriousness of the danger of the military build-up of the Nazis, claiming that it was the result of the natural will of a proud nation, that it should be taken into consideration, that it should be accepted.


Constitutional Patriotism

NSA Locks San Antonio Residents Out!

Your Home is Only as Smart as the NSA …

December 31, 2013 Los Angelas 9:00 A.M. PST





According to a report from the Municipal Government of San Antonio Texas, city residents were unable to access garages via garage door openers for hours. The NSA  was forced to admit it was running a sweeping “spying” frequency from the NSA’s radio antennas that were broadcasting at the same frequency as the garage door openers.

In the United States, a country of cars and commuters, the mysterious garage door problem quickly became an issue for local politicians. Ultimately, the municipal government solved the riddle. Fault for the error lay with the United States’ foreign intelligence service, the National Security Agency, which has offices in San Antonio. Officials at the agency were forced to admit that one of the NSA’s radio antennas was broadcasting at the same frequency as the garage door openers. Embarrassed officials at the intelligence agency promised to resolve the issue as quickly as possible, and soon the doors began opening again.

It was thanks to the garage door opener episode that Texans learned just how far the NSA’s work had encroached upon their daily lives. For quite some time now, the intelligence agency has maintained a branch with around 2,000 employees at Lackland Air Force Base, also in San Antonio. In 2005, the agency took over a former Sony computer chip plant in the western part of the city. A brisk pace of construction commenced inside this enormous compound. The acquisition of the former chip factory at Sony Place was part of a massive expansion the agency began after the events of Sept. 11, 2001.

Across this once constitutional nation we can expect more incidents like this as the Government fine tunes it’s enormous reach to spy on Americans.

Read the original article here:

Constitutional Patriotism

Obama gave $500 MILLION For Weapons To Al-Qaeda Terrorist Used On Our Four Dead Americans In Benghazi.


The Benghazi Liars

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn’t ‘switched sides in the War on Terror’ and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report.

Citizens Committee on Benghazi claims the US government allowed arms to flow to al-Qaeda-linked militants who opposed Muammar Gaddafi
Their rise to power, the group says, led to the Benghazi attack in 2012
The group claims the strongman Gaddafi offered to abdicate his presidency, but the US refused to broker his peaceful exit
The commission, part of the center-right Accuracy In Media group, concluded that the Benghazi attack was a failed kidnapping plot
US Ambassador Chris Stevens was to be captured and traded for ‘blind sheikh’ Omar Abdel-Rahman, who hatched the 1993 WTC bombing plot


The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.

‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’

The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.


The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.

Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, another commission member, told reporters Tuesday that those weapons are now ‘all in Syria.’

‘Gaddafi wasn’t a good guy, but he was being marginalized,’ Kubic recalled. ‘Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate’ shortly after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.

‘But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce,’ the commission wrote, ultimately backing the horse that would later help kill a U.S. ambassador.

Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.

‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’

In March 2011, Kubic said, U.S. Army Africa Commander General Carter told NBC News that the U.S. military was not actively targeting Muammar Gaddafi. That, Kubic revealed, was a signal to the Libyan dictator that there was a chance for a deal.

Gaddafi responded by ‘verifiably … pull[ing] his forces back from key rebel-held cities such as Benghazi and Misrata.’


Gaddafi wanted only two conditions to step down: permission to keeo fighting al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), and the lifting of sactions against him, his family, and those loyal to him.

The Obama administration’s unwillingness to help broker a peaceful exit for the Libyan strongman, ‘led to extensive loss of life (including four Americans)’ when al-Qaeda-linked militants attacked U.S. diplomatic facilities in the city of Benghazi,’ the commission told reporters.

The White House and the National Security Staff did not immediately respond to questions about the group’s findings.

‘We don’t claim to have all the answers here,’ said Roger Aronoff, whose center-right group Accuracy in Media sponsored the group and its work.

‘We hope you will, please, pursue this,’ he told reporters. ‘Check it out. Challenge us.’



Constitutional Patriotism

Rick Warren’s Chrislam Starts To Spread In America

“And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.” Revelation 3:14-16

Pastors that are really wolves in sheep’s clothing

You knew this day was going to come, when the liberal “love gospel” preachers who, desiring to fill their seats and bank accounts, would find a way to merge apostate Christianity with the Devil’s religion of Islam. That day is here.

IN 2009, Rick Warren, founder and pastor of Saddleback Community Church in Orange County California, addressed the convention of the Islamic Society of North America. Warren stated that Muslims and Christians must work together to combat stereotypes, promote peace and freedom, and solve global problems. Christians and Moslems – faith mates, soul mates and now work mates! Chrislam!

Quote of the Day: “Before we “shake your hand” in responding to your letter, we ask forgiveness of the All-Merciful One and of the Muslim community around the world.” – Rick Warren, one of the main signers of the Yale Covenant For Islam and Christian Unity

This weekend, the Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church in Houston along with Christian communities in Atlanta, Seattle, and Detroit will initiate a series of sermons that have been designed to produce an ecumenical reconciliation between Christianity and Islam. In addition to the sermons, the Sunday school lessons will center on the inspired teachings of the Prophet Mohammad. Qurans will be placed in the pews next to the Bibles.

(NOTE: Due to the overwhelming response that this article has generated, the Pastor of Memorial Church has issued a semi-denial of the events we reported. They do not, however, deny supporting and teaching a doctrine called “Jesus in the Koran. Click here to read their semi-denial. So until other information is made available to NTEB, we will run the story as is, along with their side, and you the reader can decide what’s going on.)

The concept of Chrislam, now embraced by such preachers as Rick Warren and Robert Schuller, appears to have emerged from a program on the meaning of “love your neighbor” at Grace Fellowship Church in Atlanta, Georgia “In 2001, like most Americans, we were pretty awakened to the true Islamic presence in the world and in the United States,” says Jon Stallsmith, the outreach minister at Grace Fellowship. “Jesus says we should love our neighbors. We can’t do that without having a relationship with them.”


Stallsmith maintains that a rapprochement between Muslims and Christians can be achieved by the fact that Jesus is mentioned twenty-five times in the Quran.

The Chrislam movement has gained impetus by statements from President George W. Bush and that Christians, Jews, and Muslims all worship the same God and by Rick Warren’s reference to Isa (the Muslim name for Jesus) in his prayer at the inauguration of President Barack Obama. Only 30 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Muslims, according to a Pew Forum poll. At the same time, more than half the country says they know “not very much” or “nothing at all” about the Islamic faith.

“The recent political developments and the fact that we’re fighting two wars in Muslim countries should sharpen that need to know how to talk to these guys,” Stallsmith insists “We want to find peace, reconciliation around a scriptural understanding of Jesus.”

Jesus in the Quran is neither the only-begotten Son of God nor the Messiah who was divinely appointed to restore the House of David. He is rather viewed as a prophet who was appointed by Allah to prepare mankind for the coming of Mohammad.”


CHRISLAM UPDATE: On June 26, 2011, churches all across America held Chrislam services in their churches. Click here to read story and see list of participating churches.

Is YOUR CHURCH involved with Chrislam? Find out!

Constitutional Patriotism

Obama Oks Hire Of 2 Muslim Chaplains With Terror Ties For Active US Military Service

How can the government use chaplains from a group that they know is extremist and involved in terror funding?

Washington, DC – The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity, is proudly announcing that the U.S. military is again using their chaplains for active-duty service after a 15-year lull.

ISNA has a well-documented extremist history. In 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood listed ISNA as one of its main fronts. Declassified FBI memos said ISNA is a component of the Muslim Brotherhood, who sees its “work in America as a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.”

From an Air Force ad placed in the ISNA magazine to recruit Muslim chaplains

In 2007, the U.S. government labeled ISNA a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism-financing trial involving the Holy Land Foundation funneling money to Hamas. The label was upheld in 2009 because of “ample” evidence linking ISNA to Hamas. Last year, ISNA’s Canadian affiliate lost its status as a charity because of its accounting discrepancies and links to Pakistani terrorists.

Obama Admits He Is A Muslim from Now The End Begins on Vimeo.


The two chaplains endorsed by ISNA are Sgt. Mustapha Rahouchen, who will be used by the U.S. Army, and Captain Rafael Lantiqua, who was chosen by the U.S. Air Force.

In April 2013, the Clarion Project broke the story that the U.S. Air Force Chaplain Corps had paid ISNA almost $5,000 for two advertisements in its magazine. When we contacted the Air Force about ISNA’s ties to the Brotherhood, we received the following response:

“The Islamic Society of North America is one of many religious organizations recognized by the Department of Defense that satisfy the ecclesiastical requirements to endorse qualified religious ministry professionals to serve as chaplains within the Military Departments.”

The Muslim chaplaincy services for the military and prisons were started by Abdurrahman Alamoudi, who was convicted in 2003 on terrorism-related charges. He later admitted that he was a secret member of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.

ISNA is one of the groups that the U.S. military trusts to certify Muslim chaplains. The military’s former endorsing agent was Dr. Louay Safi, an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami al-Arian.  Al-Arian, like Alamoudi, later admitted to having been a Brotherhood operative. source – Clarion Project

Constitutional Patriotism

HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip Of Cliven Bundy’s Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTimes’ Deceptively Edited Version


Apr 24, 2014  Jack Flashjfjfjfjfjfjfjfjjfjfjfjf


Watch Bundy explain how we need to keep things from going backwards for blacks, and how the Federal government has created a neo-slave class via entitlement dependency that is so bad it is arguably worse than plantation slavery was. It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse. (If you are person of low intelligence, the fact that that is his point might be too hard for you to understand.) And he’s not blaming blacks for the issues of abortions, and crime and broken families, he’s blaming the Feds. This is the exact opposite of a racist, this is an advocate for the welfare and best interests of blacks. And just as importantly, you’ll at the end of the video he gives passionate praise and defense of hispanic illegal aliens, lauding them for “better family structures than most white peoples’” Racist? Why is he praising Mexicans as better than whites, if he’s some sort of white supremacist racist?. Take a hike all you lying, character-assassinating, leftist pieces of dog shit.


Now watch the edited version of Bundy’s remarks as promoted by the left-wing Media Matters and as reported in the NY Times:

Constitutional Patriotism

Martial Law? Obama Confiscates National Guard Helicopters From All 50 States

apache1As if the Obama administration’s purchase of more than 2 billion rounds of ammunition, and nearly 3,000 urban tanks, along with their unprecedented (and highly illegal) domestic spying program was not enough to convince you that the federal government is about to suspend the Constitution once and for all, the man who once vowed to run “the most transparent administration in history” has just rather inexplicably, ordered the U.S. Army to seize every Apache attack helicopter currently in use by the National Guard.

In all, the Defense Department will confiscate 192 Apaches from National Guard units around the country and give them to the active duty Army.

In exchange for the heavily armed and highly maneuverable choppers, Guard units will receive 111 UH-60 Blackhawk transport helicopters from the Army, Defense One reports.

Last week, U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee, claiming that the measure will save taxpayers $12 billion, over the next three years.

Of course, when one considers that this ‘cost saving’ move comes from an administration which regularly runs trillion-dollar deficits and, to date, has proposed no less than 442 tax increases since taking office in January 2009, the idea of saving money for the American taxpayer is a bit hard to swallow.

So, what could be another, more reasonable explanation?

The Apache, which began service in 1986, is armed with a 30 mm M230E1 Chain Gun (with 1,200 rounds), Hellfire anti-tank missiles, and 70 general-purpose 70 mm rockets. In short, it is capable of fending-off any enemy, foreign or domestic.

Obviously, these helicopters could pose a substantial obstacle to say, a tyrant drunk on his own power, with an army at his disposal.

With the recent, attempted seizure of the Bundy family ranch in Nevada by more than 200 armed federal officers, including many snipers, we know that the Obama administration is not afraid to use force against the American people.

Furthermore, considering the unprovoked attacks and murders of U.S. citizens on their own property by federal agents, such as the Ruby Ridge and Waco massacres, we also know that the federal government has no problem suspending due process and using lethal force on its own citizens. Couple that with the as yet, unexplained, massive arms buildup by the Department of Homeland Security, and the National Defense Authorization Act which allows the feds to arrest and detain any U.S. citizen indefinitely without charges, and even the most establishment-minded American should be able to see what is coming.

There are a few governors around the country who would not stand for martial-law being arbitrarily declared by this or any president, but without any teeth (i.e. Apache attack helicopters) what could they use to stop Obama’s tyranny?

Source –

Constitutional Patriotism






IF anything, there has been a rock solid effort – over several decades – to divide the United States of America into “opposing” sides; a purposeful creation of fissures, which will eventually lead to civil war.

And though time marches on, revolutionaries seeking to upend America are very much alive, agitating for a second go around. The issue of slavery was the catalyst for the first one, but there are many ways to enslave people, aside from the most obvious. Slavery can be a physical manifestation, or a shackling of ones personal initiative and responsibility. Never forget this. 

{Abraham Lincoln}

  1809, abraham lincoln, hodgenville, kentucky

From the leftist’s revolutionary perspective, anything which divides America is a “good” result. Thumbs up…fist bumps all around…This is precisely why decades of “divide and conquer” has been simmering on a slow boil, at least since the 1960′s, when their radical foot soldiers set foot on America’s campuses
Along this vein, purposefully sparking racial discord (paradoxically, racial crimes were the underlying factor to the first civil war, a war which had to be fought and won…but that was then…and this is now) has been a sine qua non to sowing the seeds of discontent. The Radical-in-Chief is a master in this racially divisive domain.
That being said, what does the aforementioned have to do with Obama Inc.’s stoking the fires for a civil war, and the Bundy Ranch stand offas its staging ground? Well, the principles behind implanting time bombs, here and there, are quite similar. Be they racial fires, “typical” class warfare messaging, or pitting those who hold to the Constitution against others who want to rip it to shreds, pressure points run along a continuum…from low…to medium…to high.
ENTER: the infamous “Rules for Radicals”. Saul Alinsky, its author, a freakin’ evil genius. Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (Hill’s too, and many of their cadre) guru, at least in the community organizing realm. The “how to” creator of “organized” chaos! 
So, as is the wont of most dedicated radicals, the Revolutionary-in-Chief has worked assiduously (and not being a typical hard worker, his efforts required much commitment and discipline) towards applying pressuring points, over his first and second terms.
Pressure Point One:
His first term stoked the ground for racial fires, letting “certain” folks know he (and his entire gangster regime) had their backs. His second (ignominious) term elicited more of the same. Concomitantly, the gimme, gimme, perpetually aggrieved crowd understood that the POTUS “felt their pain”, and whatever outrages they pulled, well, jail time would not be an end result. How “deserving”. How “fair”.
Pressure Point Two:
More pointedly, the Radical-in-Chief gave carte blanche for Federal forces to view themselves as militarized storm troopers, posse comitatus be damned. By ensuring that DHS and its umbrella agencies viewed patriots as “domestic terrorists’, how shocking was it that the BLM behaved as such:

Obama’s national guard placed bulls eyes on patriots:a path to gun control and worse!

DUE to all the above and so much more, perspectives by counter terror expert Dave Gaubatz, re “red line” indicators of an American civil war, must be taken VERY seriously. Few have the “boots on the ground” experience, in this very arena, as does this outstanding patriot. 
Where Are Obama and Holder During a Pending Blood Bath In Nevada?
11 Apr 2014
By: Dave Gaubatz
A few weeks ago I wrote an article about the potential of a civil war in America. While in Iraq it was very easy to see that a civil war was going to happen.  It did. Hundreds of thousands have died in Iraq during the past 10 years.  The signs are now in America and innocent Americans could be murdered by out of control Federal Agents in Clark County, Nevada.
Where are our great leaders such as Obama and Holder?  They sure aren’t standing up for the Constitution of the United States.  Why aren’t they on every major TV channel in America trying to calm the situation brewing in Nevada?  Neither Obama or Holder will get involved in a potential blood war because the victim’s and their supporters are a majority of White people.  They are not Black.  I may be wrong but if Holder can stand up and imply he and Obama receive more negative attention while in office because they are black then I can call this situation as I see it.
During Obama’s 5 plus years he has had no problem getting involved in state level investigations when the victim was Black.  He inserted himself into a minor investigation in Cambridge when local police received a call about a potential burglar in a house.  The local police were simply responding to a call and doing their job.  Obama said, “the Cambridge police acted stupidly”.  He held news conferences and had no problem personally getting involved in a low level non federal investigation (and no one was hurt).  Obama got involved because the accused was a White police officer and the alleged victim was Black.  Obama later apologized and had a beer with the police officer.  Exactly what an example our children do not need to see or hear about.
Obama  inserted himself into the Zimmerman investigation.  Why? Because the media had made Zimmerman (suspect) out to be White, although he was not.  The victim was Black and this was enough for Obama and Holder to get involved.
Now we have a Rancher in Nevada whose family has lived on ‘Nevada Property’ since the mid 1800′s and Federal Agents are on the verge of killing innocent people as they killed innocent children in Waco, TX.  There have been reports that armed militia members are en-route to Nevada to stand up for Rancher Bundy.  Again I ask where are Obama and Holder when they are needed to potentially stop Federal Agents and innocent Americans from engaging in a battle that could kill many, and could be the trigger for a civil war in America.
I travel all across America and if I still worked for the Federal government I would write an investigative analysis and say our country is on the verge of a war between American citizens and the U.S. government.
My analysis is there is a strong possibility Obama and Holder want the ‘range war’.  Keep in mind the ranchers and the majority of their on ground supporters are White and militia members.  My analysis would further state it appears our federal government leaders want a blood bath.  This could help the liberal and communist agenda of both Obama and Holder.  Marshall law could be established by Obama and a federal crackdown on any American who owns firearms and who opposes the Obama regime.  This is what their ideology has been since they took office.  For many years the U.S. government relied on my analysis of major domestic and international situations.  They should now.
I had always been proud of being a U.S. Federal Agent, but if I were in the Nevada ranch dispute, I would consider it dishonorable to target innocent Americans trying to protect their property that has been in their family a hundred plus years.  The Federal Agents on the ground should be ashamed and resign.  The Sheriff of Clark County Nevada should get off his sorry ass and help the citizens under his jurisdiction.
Conclusion: A civil war in America is imminent.  It will happen sooner than most Americans could ever imagine. The poor at best leadership of Obama and Holder is shameful and the murders of innocent people in Nevada could be prevented…if that is what he really wanted.


Pointedly, this site has consistently warned about a predictable looming danger, emanated from turning otherwise benign Fed agencies (initiated to terrorize those who oppose Fed overreach), as well regular police forces, into de facto MILITARY state readiness. So, why is everyone so shocked at the GROWING menace: The United States of SWAT! 

MOST significantly, a civil war allows dictatorial leaders (even those elected “democratically”) to declare “martial law”; the prerequisite for totalitarian rule. Believe it – or not. It’s your freedoms on the line. Quite possibly, your funeral(s)!

Constitutional Patriotism

Santilli Sternly Warns Harry Reid: Domestic Enemy Harry Reid Declares Families Supporting Cliven Bundy “Domestic Terrorists”

Screenshot 2014-04-17 20.57.02

Although some people would consider being declared a “domestic terrorist” derogatory, we should all take pause to recognize how fearful and desperate the far left has become as a result of the successful Bundy Ranch standoff between the American people and the federal government.  We The People won the Battle of Bundy Ranch, and the liberal left is panicked.  All they have left is a flailing,  last ditched attempt to demonize their adversary with stale “Saul Alinski” styled tactics.  They are well on their way to losing this war, and his comments are the first step towards the most logical and peaceful option left — surrender with a white flag & leave the people alone.

For the first time since 1948 at the Battle of Athens, Tennessee, civilians came to Bundy Ranch forced to take up arms in their own defense against government tyranny.   The civilian militia was very conscious about lawful and constitutional possession of firearms in the State of Nevada, as well as disciplining themselves to maintain a defensive posture behind the peaceful family protestors.

Harry Reid needs to understand one very important element of this Constitutional crisis, We The People are determined to protect our country from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and it is clear that Harry Reid has not only betrayed the United States of America by selling out the American People to China, corporate interests and multi-billionaire cronies, we absolutely consider him a domestic enemy and we are putting him on notice that he will be dealt with to the fullest extent that the U.S. Constitution will allow.

Harry Reid aligned with Communist China to build solar farms in Nevada.  Rory Reid, Harry’s son, was involved in setting up the deal with China.

Harry Reid changed the borders of the land protecting the desert tortoise in order to curry favor to his campaign contributor.

Neil Kornze, the head of the Bureau of Land Management is headed by Reid’s former Chief of Staff.  The BLM is the gestapo arm which seized Nevada land which they do not own, stole Bundy Ranch Cattle, set up an undeclared state of martial law in Clarke County, beat & tased family members who wanted to investigate BLM alleged crimes, and then threatened to shoot & kill American family members who supported the Bundy’s.

Harry Reid has literally purchased favor from Sheriff Douglas Gillespie, who ultimately aligned with Reid when confronted with the option of siding with the U.S. Constitution and the American people peacefully protesting at the Bundy Ranch, or siding with a tyrannical federal government.   The relationship between Reid and Gillespie resulted in the potential loss of life as Reid, Gillespie, and the BLM conspired to overpower the Bundy’s with force.

The “court orders” which Reid relies upon to justify the tyrannical actions of the federal government were obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Nevada State sovereignty rights.  Additionally, the court orders obtained by the federal government were never acted upon back in the 90′s.  Essentially, Cliven Bundy refused to recognize the federal government in this land use dispute, asked them to get off the land and leave him alone, and then continued to maintain possession of his cattle and use of the land as his family had since 1877.  Essentially, Cliven Bundy is now the legal owner of 600,000 acres through something called adverse possession and/or prescriptive easement.  The government had a court order, failed to secure the property, and after five years — in simple terms — Mr. Bundy is now the legal owner of the land.  The federal government made the incompetent and grave mistake of abandoning the land which Mr. Bundy is now lawfully and legally entitled to.   If Harry Reid is not aware of these facts, he should be fired for incompetence.

Harry Reid, among many other things, is complicit in assisting Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Eric Holder, and many others of overthrowing the U.S. Government.   Individuals within the U.S. Government have committed treason against the United States, and Mr. Reid has turned a blind eye.  In fact, he has helped treasonous criminals escape prosecution.

Harry Reid Quote: “….this isn’t over…”    Response: “You’re damn right it ain’t over, and it won’t be until you are arrested, tried and then executed for treason against the USA.”

Harry Reid Quote: ”Nevada ranchers are suppose to pay their taxes and follow the law”   Response:  ” Yes, but taxes should be paid to the people of the State of the Nevada, and Senator Reid (all elected officials) must follow the U.S. Constitution — they are not exempt from or above the law, and will be arrested and prosecuted accordingly by We The People.”

Harry Reid Quote:“…I’ve spoken to Sheriff Gillespie in detail, Eric Holder in detail, and the Director of the FBI in detail, and the Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell”     Response:  “Gillespie is an Unconstitutional Sheriff and put people’s loves in jeopardy by his allegiance to Reid & the BLM.  Eric Holder must be prosecuted for Fast & Furious, as well as other crimes such as the Oklahoma City Bombing cover-up.  he is a commie crony of Obama, and will be dealt with when the people show up at his front doorstep soon to arrest him.  The Director of the FBI is running the most corrupt agency of the U.S. Government.  The FBI has covered up almost every major crime in the USA including the JFK Assassination, Vietnam Gulf of Tonkin false flag, TWA Flight 800, Wall Street theft of trillions, 9-11, Boston Marathon Bombing, and of course Harry Reid wants to speak to the agency who specializes in killing families such as WACO.  Sally Jewell is a communist puke who is all about grabbing land and coming down on “climate change deniars”.  She need to be deported to China where her communism is socially acceptable.

Harry Reid Quote: ”there were hundred of people who came there…they had sniper rifles on the freeway….they had assault weapons…they had automatic weapons….and we a former Sheriff said we had women and children there, and if anyone got hurt, we want to make sure they got hurt first…”     Response:  ”Citizens were forced to take up arms to defend the family members who came there to protest and demand Constitutionality from the U.S. Gov’t.  Thank God they showed up, because the federal government was prepared to kill Americans.  Thank God they showed up with enough firepower to defend the American people from Eric Holder’s desire to wage another WACO massacre.  As to the ‘former sheriff’, Mr. Reid did not mention his name because Sheriff Mack would have sued him for lied with his name.  The statement was not only false and inaccurate, it is considered communist propaganda from an enemy of the American People.  Where were YOU Harry Reid. The unarmed protestors did not fear the guns, because they were on the right side of history & the U.S. Constitution.   The disarmed liberals who oppose liberty & freedom should reconsider their gun grabbing & communist overthrow after they count the guns and Americans defending our nation behind every blade of grass.

Harry Reid Quote: ”these people…who hold themselves out to be patriots….they are not.  They are nothing more than domestic terrorists, and we are in a country where people should follow the law.”     Response:  ”These People” are Americans and are even more patriotic than the Ukrainians, the Communist Chinese, or Al Qaeda in Syria which Reid is supporting with funds and favor.    The only people who should fear “these people” are the ones who have overthrown our government and supported our enemies.   Reid, you are the domestic enemy which our Constitution says we must defend against, and we will.

Harry Reid Quote:“there’s a task force being set up to deal with Bundy, and Gillespie is involved as well.”  Response: We have a task force as well, and it kicked your arse at Bundy Ranch.  No task force or unconstitutional Sheriff will ever succeed in your pursuit of violating our Constitution, stealing our property, seizing our land, and threatening to kill us when we enforce the supreme law of the land because you refuse to.  Gillespie’s involvement petrifies the American people, but only because his negligence put lives in jeopardy.

The Bundy Women are among the most courageous women in America, and they volunteered to be in front of the line in the face of tyranny.  They were not afraid to die in pursuit of liberty and freedom.  They were not told to do anything to ‘win’ over the brute force tyranny on full display by the U.S. Government at Bundy Ranch.  The “people” who support the Bundy family realize how much is at stake in this matter.  If the U.S. Government is allowed to over power the Bundy Family, they can do it to any of us.  We stand in their defense as true American patriots who will not hesitate to die in defense of our God-given rights.

Harry Reid, our task force is comprised of 10′s of millions of Americans who will never give in.  We will never relent.  We will all die free, especially if we must die in our defense against what you represent.  Calling any of us “domestic terrorists” won’t work with anyone but your dumbed-down  liberal gun grabbing minions, but we ask you to please continue to ask liberals to rely upon the government to defend them  —- the perfect adversary we could ever wish for are a bunch of metro-sexual tortoise sympathizers armed with only an iPhone.  We’ll save our country on their behalf too, but at least we won’t have to worry about them shooting back in resistance.

To every single federal government employee and law enforcement official.  A day will come very very soon when you will have to choose between siding with the American People & the U.S. Constitution, or following Harry Reid’s “task force”.  We ask you to stand down in favor of peace, the American people and the U.S. Constitution.  Harry Reid is a coward who wants you to kill Americans and be set up to slaughter as his BLM did at the Bundy Ranch standoff.  We the people were there fighting for your families, and had your safety in mind; which is why not one shot was fired.  If any one of you made the wrong unconstitutional  choice and fired upon unarmed protestors; all of you would have died due to the negligence of your superiors. They DO NOT have your safety and best interests in mind, especially not Harry Reid.  Harry is more concerned about his son Rory getting rich on deals with China, making money from corporations, and using each of you as expendable members of his personal army.  He is a domestic enemy that you have been sworn to defend our nation against, and we ask you to make the right choice when the next opportunity presents itself to defend our beautiful nation and people.  You have a chance to become the courageous heroes our nation so desperately needs to survive.

We ask everyone to stand with us courageously in peace, under the U.S. Constitution and the American people, but most importantly, for the sake of saving our nation.  We proved that we are men and women of peace and principle, and we know that our nation was founded by like minded patriots who care about our families and freedom.  Pause a moment and think about one very important fact, the holocaust would never have occurred if each military member, railroad conductor, government servant, etc. decided not to do their “job” of leading the Jews to the ovens and camps.  If each of you choose to not follow Harry Reid and his cronies, he will never be able to successfully overthrow our country. Stand down. Join us. Let’s take our country back and prepare to throw these criminals in jail.  We can do this without one shot being fired, but please always remember, once you fire the first shot, we must defend ourselves and we will win this battle between good and evil, even if it means we die trying to resist tyranny & enslavement.  We are prepared to die if you try to kill our peace & liberty loving families. Please choose our side; form a new “task force” and arrest Harry Reid, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and any other individual who tells you to kill Americans who are trying to save their country.

The Pete Santilli Show broadcasts live on The Guerilla Media Network.  Please join us on the Guerilla Media Network broadcasting your favorite talk shows, political art and news 24/7.  

If you would like to express your opinions or concerns on the air during the live broadcast of The Pete Santilli Show, please call (218) 862-9829