In all of these events one fact, beyond all others, stands out….in what was once called “The Land of the Free, And the Home of the Brave”…..the United States today has become “The Land Of Slave, And the Home of the Coward”….and these Americans have only themselves to blame.
Suing the State When You’re Not the State
According to the treaties have been signed and are extant in International Law for the past 10 centuries, you cannot sue the state. This is the current system of “voluntary” forced labor using arbitrary private monopolistic powers. However, “fighting” the system with the system is never going to work. The U.S. and its affiliate states have copyrighted all of their “law”. If you use it without a variation of agreement, you are a tort-feasor. The remedy is to pledge to support a better system, and stop begging and expecting this one to change. This alone is reason to “move out” or “expatriate”. In other words, create a new state and become the state. [Not their state, a new one.] The template is as follows: “When in the course of human events, a long train of abuses (remember)” … This concept is firmed up in Article VII above, where it states that any individual protected by the state, loses that protection when they sue the state and/or its agents, thereby creating an inability within a “state” for “citizens/subjects” to have a right to redress.
“We the People” have no Right to Petition for a Redress of Grievance.
We The People vs. United States
The bigger problem here is that an “individual” becomes public enemy #1 of the state when they sue the state, i.e. a paper/domestic terrorist. When you become “stateless” with no protection, you are then equivalent to an alien. The final two articles make it clear that nationals, citizens, residents, and aliens, all; have the same rights, which are limited civil rights that are granted. You “belong” to them and ALL of your contracts prove it, because you have not “come out of her”. And, you cannot come out of the jurisdiction, by going into an agency of the jurisdiction; i.e. “state citizen” or “secured party under the secretary of the state of”. This is because you have failed to pledge to a separate jurisdiction. And, if you sue, then you become a stateless alien and must submit, end of story.
Sovereign State Citizen Domestic Terrorist Case
However, you can use the International protocols of peaceful settlement and come out. It is moral and it is scriptural. Some examples are Daniel, Joseph, Abraham and Moses.
By the way, there is no such thing as “private capacity” if both you and the agent you sue “belong to the state”. If you want to see the result of how the “state” will then proceed… then read below.]
The United States Citizen
General immunities pertaining to prosecutors, judges and government agents
1.) Prosecutor may violate civil rights in initiating prosecution and presenting case.
– United States Supreme Court in Imbler v. Pachtmanz 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
2.) Immunity extends to all activities closely associated with litigation or potential litigation.
– Second Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Davisv. Grusemever, 996 F.2d 617 (1993)
3.) Prosecutor may knowingly use false testimony and suppress evidence. – United States Supreme Court in Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
4.) Prosecutor may file charges without any investigation.
– Eighth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1337 (1986)
5.) Prosecutor may file charges outside of his jurisdiction.
– Eighth Circuit Federal Court of appeal in Myers v. Morris, 840 F.2d 1337 (1986)
6.) Prosecutor may knowingly offer perjured testimony.
– Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 1310 (1987)
7.) Prosecutor can suppress exculpatory evidence. (Exculpatory defined: Evidence showing one innocent)
– Fifth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in HENZEL v. GERSTEIN, 608 F.2d 654 (1979)
8.) Prosecutors are immune from lawsuit for conspiring with judges to determine outcome of judicial proceedings.
– Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 E.2d 1072 (1986)
9.) Prosecutor may knowingly file charges against innocent persons for a crime that never occurred.
– Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in NORTON v. LIDDEL, 620 F.2d 1375 (1980)
This is how they “rule” over their property. If you are “theirs” or in their system, then you are their property and this is how they treat their property. You cannot use their “code or law” against them, because they hold the copyright. IF you cannot accept that the only ones that have a “right” to practice with their copyright are their attorneys, then you are or will be trespassing across “their private copywritten law”, and you will be dealt with in the manner stated above.
We are enemies of the State (Trading with the Enemy Act 1933 Act of 1917 & 1933) (People declared the Enemy) Oct. 6, 1917, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, Section 2 subdivision ( c ) Chapter 106 – Enemy defined “other than citizens of the United States…” March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of Oct. 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended as follows: “…any person within the United States.” See H.R. 1491 Public No. 1.
Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914 (No U.C.C. Redemption Manuel Process or attempting to become the secured party creditor)
UCC Redemption proponents offer ‘cure all claims’ and ‘silver bullet solutions’ to present dilemmas in the struggle for freedom and independence. One of the reasons the world is in such trouble today is because we are to willing to sign on to offers that sound to good to be true. If we will grab at straws in desperation why not grab at strawmen?
The Straw Man is the “accommodation party” of UCC 3 — 415. The name is credit. (See Blacks 6th. “Accommodation party” and “Straw Man”). Therefore the right (or the use) has been separated from the title (or deed). The “”straw man” holds the title (and “he/it” belongs to the government’s client who bought the bond/title) and the flesh and blood man has only naked possession with the limited “right” to use the thing (like his body or his alleged possessions and land, which now becomes “usury” of another title/property).
This is why civil rights suits get dismissed out-of-court on Civil Rule 12 (B)(6): “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”. The word: “claim” is another word for “title”. So you have “failed to state a “title” upon which relief can be granted”. You do not own the “title” even to our own bodies anymore, and the United States verified this with SENATE RESOLUTION #62…”All ownership is in the hands of the State” and your “use” of any property or labor, including your own….”is subordinate to the STATE”. See above.
“The United States of America by contract, gave up all right, title or interest in said property, without any conditions set forth”
Ensminger Case 1995
If you are claiming to be an American Citizen, a State Citizen, or State National and the United States gave up all Rights, Title, and Interest by contract then where does that leave you?
What is the result?
A very sophisticated form of peonage-servitude and the Constitution does not apply because the government, on all levels, is thrown into international commerce, the law merchant, now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. [See Public Law 88 — 244 in which the U.S. subscribed to private international law. See definition of “goods” under the UCC at 2 — 105 (1) and 9– 105 (1) in which animals, i.e. — humans and their unborn offspring, become “goods” sellable in commerce.]
Revelation 18:…..11-17“The traders will cry and carry on because the bottom dropped out of business, no more market for their goods: gold, silver, precious gems, pearls; fabrics of fine linen, purple, silk, scarlet; perfumed wood and vessels of ivory, precious woods, bronze, iron, and marble; cinnamon and spice, incense, myrrh, and frankincense; wine and oil, flour and wheat; cattle, sheep, horses, and chariots. And slaves—their terrible traffic in human lives.
“And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.” 2 Peter 2:3
We are Human Resources [Executive Order 13037 Sec. 2(b)] William J. Clinton Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 8:45 a.m., March 5, 1997
NOTE: Now you know what a “human resource” is. Your energy and intellect are “re-sourced”, meaning taken from the “source” (i.e. You) and “sourced” to something else (i.e. The U.S. Government’s monetary system of “good faith” (belief) and credit.
Our Creator created Man, not PERSONS. And He is not a respecter of PERSONS. Acts 10:34
A PERSON is a corporation, a fictitious entity used under the color of law. A Man is a Living, breathing, spiritual creation.
It is a maxim of law that “every person is a man, but not every man a person”.
“Redemption is deliverance from the power of an alien dominion and the enjoyment of the resulting freedom. It involves the idea of restoration to one who possesses a more fundamental right or interest. The best example of redemption in the Old Testament was the deliverance of the children of Israel from bondage, from the dominion of the alien power in Egypt.”
33But seek ye first the kingdomof God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
12That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
1He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy.
2When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.
“Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?”
20For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.
32Thou shalt make no covenant (contract) with them, nor with their gods (judges).
gods[Strong’s # 430] covenant[Strong’s # 1285]
25And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles (nations) exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.
26But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.
36Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world (apt and harmonious constitutional order, government): if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule12 (h) (3) Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction.
“If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.” http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule12.htm
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 9(a).Pleading Special Matters
(a) Capacity or Authority to Sue; Legal Existence.
The word Capacity used in Federal Rule 9(a) is otherwise known as Standing. Or can also be defined as Subject Matter Jurisdiction under Federal Rule 12(h)(3). If a court wants to “sue” you and they lack the Capacity, Standing, or Subject Matter Jurisdiction to do so then they must throw the case out. And the same goes for you if you try and sue the state when you are not the state, or lack the status/standing to state a claim for which relief can be granted. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule9.htm
U.C.C. § 5-116. Choice of Law and Forum.
“Scire leges, non hoc verba earum tenere, sed vim et potestatem,” Which in English is “To know the law is, not to observe their mere words, but their force and power.” Bouvier’s (1914), page 2162.
“Mistaken identity” not only takes in ‘the name,’ but more importantly, it takes in the force and power of ‘the law of one’s forum of choice.’ The question is which law forum are you choosing? And the questions in the mind of ruling judges would be, “what law do you identify with? Where do you reside? Who is your master, etc?” These questions all concern your ‘identity.’ Or, who you identify with. Christ or Caesar? And do your contracts prove so? In other words, do your actions speak louder than words?
Again, It is a maxim of law that, “It is natural for a thing to be unbound in the same way in which it was bound” (Naturale est quidlibet dissolvi eo modo quo ligatur).